1、建党的中英文翻译的文章篇一：中英互译文章What we get wrong about China Global Public Square By Bhaskar Chakravorti, Special to CNNEditors note: Bhaskar Chakravorti is senior associate dean of International Business and Finance and founding executive director of the Institute for Business in the Global Context at The Fle
2、tcher School at Tufts University. The views expressed are the authors own. We now know who will be leading the two most important nations for the global economy for the next four years in the United States case, and for a decade in Chinas. By the time President Obama is ready to leave office, China
3、will have passed the U.S. in GDP terms, at least according to a report by the OECD. But with GDP no longer Chinese leaders top concern, the country has its sights set on catching up with the U.S. in another area innovation. On a recent to visit to speak at the World Economic Forums Summer Davos in T
4、ianjin, I was struck by the sense of urgency among Chinese leaders to close the gap when it comes to innovation. It was clear to me that it is time for the U.S. to payclose attention, because urgency in China is generally followed by execution.Unfortunately, America has worked itself up over the wro
5、ng issues as far as “competitiveness” is concerned: we bemoan the fact that China has taken our jobs （and 42 percent of Americans believe that China is already the worlds largest economy, a Pew survey suggested）. But those worried about the countrys future would be better served focusing on U.S. com
6、petitiveness in innovation, something that has the potential to put this countrys growth back on track. The problem is that there is a general （and misplaced） belief that China will always be a loser, that it can only imitate, not innovate. Critics argue that its society is too top-down and that Ame
7、rican innovation will always be buoyed by Silicon Valley. More from CNN: U.S. needs an infrastructure bank But the reality is that it is na?ve to believe China cannot narrow the gap in innovation, and the second Obama administration would do well to consider that America could actually learn a thing
8、 or two from across the Pacific. And it could start by grappling with some widely held myths: 1. There is no innovation in China, only piracy and imitation. Most innovation begins with imitation; America got its start by imitating inventions from the Old World. Meanwhile, manyChinese imitations, suc
9、h as Alibaba, Tencent or Sina Weibo, have moved far beyond being mere copies of their U.S. counterparts. Each is solving problems uniquely relevant to Chinese businesses and consumers, something that could create platforms for innovations that are propelled into global markets. 2. The Chinese approa
10、ch to innovation is too top-down and state-led real innovation only comes from the bottom-up. The Chinese state is committed to bringing China to the ranks of the innovative nations by 2020. Silicon Valley entrepreneurs might shudder at this top-down approach. Yet consider, for example, where the Am
11、erican entrepreneur would be if the U.S. government had not funded the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency that gave birth to the Internet. The state must play a role in investing in foundational innovations, such as the Internet and mobile technologies. Once these foundations are laid, then a
12、 competitive bottom-up ecosystem will encourage creative destruction. But sadly, U.S. government investment in such foundational innovations has been on a steady decline.3. Intellectual property rights protection in China is too weak to encourage innovation.Chinas weaker intellectual property protec
13、tion could, arguably, make it easier to foster a climate conducive to open innovation. Of course, a balance needs to be struck between open access to intellectual property and protecting it with no protection, innovation will stall, because investors need returns on their investment. Unfortunately,
14、in the U.S., intellectual property protections block innovation just as much as they promote it. 4. In a globalized economy, sustaining innovation requires investment in international markets; Chinas brand and soft power abroad is weak and dated.Despite several uesolved issues such as territorial di
15、sputes and balance of trade, Chinas influence in the worldsfast-growing regions, including Africa, Latin America and East Asia, is growing more rapidly than that of the United States. When Chinese innovations look for inputs or consumers and they turn to these markets, they are likely to have as man
16、yopportunities as well-known U.S. brands perhaps even a better chance. Indeed, when it comes to ties with Africa and Latin America, China is often one step ahead of the U.S.5. Chinas education model emphasizes rote learning;innovation can only flourish in environments that encourage exploration, critical thinking and a broad
