丽哈.docx
- 文档编号:24953233
- 上传时间:2023-06-03
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:10
- 大小:24.33KB
丽哈.docx
《丽哈.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《丽哈.docx(10页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
丽哈
CollaborativePrincipledNegotiation
Inthesecondhalfofthetwentiethcentury,therapiddevelopmentofeconomyglobalizationandintegration,bypromisesofgreatbenefitsfromfreeflowofpeople,goods,servicesandcapital,havemingledallcountriesandareasintooneinterdependentandinterrelatedbody.Resolvingpolitical,especiallyeconomydisputesandconflictsbypeacefulmeansbasedonequalityandmutualbenefithasprevailedininternationalaffairssincecountriesstartedtovieweachotheraspartnersandcooperatorsratherthanadversariesandantagonists.Somescholarsandsocialworkersbeginadvocatingabrandnewidea,whichwin—winconcept.Collaborativeprinciplednegotiationbasedonmutualsuccessandconvergenceofinterestsisatypicalexampleofthisconcept.Practicesdemonstrateditshigheffectivenessindealingwithdisagreementandconflictsininternationalbusinessnegotiation,therefore,ithasbecomewidelyaccepted.
Negotiationisregardedasanimportantandnecessarysocialactivity,especiallyininternationalbusinessnegotiation,agreatimpulsetosocialeconomicdevelopmentinourmodernlife.Humanbeingsarenotcomputers.Weareimperfectlyskilledincommunication,weperceivetheactionsandwordsofothersdifferentlyandwearecreaturesoflongmemoriesandstrongemotions.Emotions,personalities,feelingsandsoonbecomeentangledinthesubstanceoftheproblem.Andsowewilltendtotakeresponsestotheissuesaspersonalattacks.
It’sgenerallyunderstoodthatinnegotiationsproblemswillbediscussedandresolvediftalksaregoingoninafriendlyandsincereatmosphere.Unfortunatelymoreoftenthannothightensionisbuildupduetonegotiators’prejudiceagainsttheotherparty’sintention.Itisconceivablethatnegotiationswouldbedirectedtopersonaldisputesandbothsidessaysomethinghurtingeachotherwhensuchprejudiceormisunderstandingexists.Asaresultnegotiators’personalfeelingismingledwithinterestsandeventstobediscussed.Forexample,youmayfeelveryuncomfortablewhenyourcounterpartappearsarrogantandsuperior,soyouprobablythrowoutsomethingtoknockoffhisarrogance,whichmayfurtherirritatehimandmakehimtakeretaliationaction.Thefocusofnegotiationisshiftedfrominterestsandissuesofbothpartiestopersonaldignityandself—respect,thustheattacksandquarrelsendupwithnothing.Inothercasesyourcounterpartmaymisunderstandyourintentionandopenlyshowhisemotionwhenyoumakecommentsonhisopinionandeventshehasdescribed.
Peopleproblemsoftenmainlytendtoinvolveproblemsofperception,emotion,andcommunication.Perceptionsareimportantbecausetheydefinetheproblemandsolution.Whilethereisan“objectivereality”,therealityisinterpreteddifferentlybydifferentpeopleindifferentsituations.Whendifferentpartieshavedifferentunderstandingsoftheirdispute,effectivenegotiationmaybedifficulttoachieve.Thisiswhatwehavebeencallingframingproblems—theproblemsthatpeopleseeordefineasituationdifferently,dependingonwhotheyareandwhattheirsituationsare.Soitiscrucialforbothsidestounderstandtheothers’viewpoints.Therearesevenbasicwaysforhandlingtheproblemsofperception.
Peopleproblemsalsoofteninvolvedifficultemotions—fear,anger,distrustandanxietyforexample.Theseemotionsgetintertwinedwiththesubstantiveissuesinthedisputeandmakebothhardertodealwith.Peopleoftenreactwithfearorangerwhentheyfeelthattheirinterestsarethreatened.Thefirststepindealingwithemotionsistoacknowledgethem,andtrytounderstandtheirsource.Thepartiesmustacknowledgethefactthatcertainemotionsarepresent,evenwhentheydon’tseethosefeelingsasreasonable.Dismissinganother’sfeelingasunreasonableislikelytoprovokeanevenmoreintenseemotionalresponse.Thepartiesmustallowtheothersidetoexpresstheiremotions.Theymustnotreactemotionallytoemotionaloutbursts.Symbolicgesturessuchasapologiesoranexpressionofsympathycanhelptodefusestrongemotions.
Communicationisthethirdmainsourceofpeopleproblems.Negotiatorsmaynotbespeakingtoeachother,butmaysimplygrandstandfortheirrespectiveconstituencies.Thepartiesmaynotbelisteningtoeachother,butmayinsteadbeplanningtheirownresponses.Evenwhenthepartiesarespeakingtoeachotherandarelistening,misunderstandingsmayoccur.Tocombattheseproblems,thepartiesshouldemployactivelistening.Thelistenersshouldgivethespeakertheirfullattention,occasionallysummarizingthespeaker’spointstoconfirmtheirunderstanding.Itisimportanttorememberthatunderstandingtheother’scasedoesn’tmeanagreeingwithit.Speakersshoulddirecttheirspeechtowardtheotherpartiesandkeepfocusedonwhattheyaretryingtocommunicate.Eachsideshouldavoidblamingorattackingtheother,andshouldspeakaboutthemselves.Generallythebestwaytodealwithpeopleproblemsistopreventthemfromarising.Peopleproblemsarelesslikelytocomeupifthepartieshaveagoodrelationship,andthinkofeachotheraspartnersinnegotiationratherthanadversaries.
Ongeneral,toseparatepeoplefromproblem,thecrucialpointistounderstandtheotherparty,controlone’sownemotionandstrengthencommunication.Welookforchancestocorrectourcounterpartsafterwardsiftheiropinionisnotright;weallowthemtoexpresstheirdissatisfactioniftheyfeelupsetandwefindmorechancestoexchangeouropinionsifmisunderstandinghappens.Bydoingsowetreatourcounterpartasacooperatorsittingonthesameboatsinkingandfloatingtogether,andthecourseofnegotiationasaprocessofachievingmutualsuccesshandinhand.
Conflictsofinterestsbringpeopletonegotiationtable.Negotiationaboutinterestsmeansnegotiatingthingsthatpeoplereallywantandneed,notwhattheysaythattheywantorneed,thesearenotthesame.Innegotiation,itisveryoftendifficulttofocusoninterestssincetheinterestsofonepartyarefrequentlynotclearlyidentifiedandexpressedoutwardly,andcomparativelyspeakingpositionsareconcreteandexplicitlyexposedtoeachother.Oneimportanttaskofnegotiationistooverpassone’spositionandtolookforsolutionssatisfyingbothparties’interests.
Positionsmaybethoughtofasone--dimensionalpointinaspaceofinfinitepossiblesolution.Positionsaresymbolicrepresentationsofaparticipant’sunderlyinginterests.Peopletendtotakeextremepositionsthataredesignedtocountertheiropponent’spositionforthepurposeofhavingtheirinterestsrealizedorprotectingtheirinterestsorgainingmoreinterests.
Goodagreementsfocusontheparties’interestsnottheirpositions.Yourpositionissomethingyouhavedecidedupon,yourinterestsarewhatcauseyoutosodecide.Ifaskedwhytheyaretakingthatposition,itoftenturnsoutthattheunderlyingreasons—theirtrueinterestsandneeds—areactuallycompatible,notmutuallyexclusive.Whenaproblemisdefinedintermsoftheparties’underlyinginterests,itisoftenpossibletofindasolutionthatissatisfiesbothparties’interests.Innegotiation,therearealwaysmultiple,shared,compatibleandconflictinginterests.Thefirststepistoidentifytheparties’interestsregardingtheissueathand.Thiscanbedonebyaskingwhytheyholdthepositionstheydo,andbyconsideringwhytheyholdsomeotherpossibleposition.Eachpartyusuallyhasanumberofdifferentinterestsunderlyingtheirpositions.Andinterestsmaydiffersomewhatamongtheindividualmembersofeachside.However,allpeoplewillsharecertainbasicinterestsorneeds,suchastheneedforsecurityandeconomicwell—being.Identifyingsharedandcompatibleinterestsas“commonground”or“pointsofagreement”ishelpfulinestablishingafoundationforadditionalnegotiationdiscussions.Oncethepartieshaveidentifiedtheirinterests,theymustdiscussthemtogether.Ifapartywantstheothersidetotaketheirinterestsintoaccount,thatpartymustexplaintheirinterestsclearly.Theothersidewillbemoremotivatedtotakethoseinterestsintoaccountifthefirstpartyshowsthattheyarepayingattentiontotheotherside’sinterests.Ifwehavelearnedanythingaboutthepast,itisthat“wecan’tchangeit”.Thepastmayhelpustoidentifyproblemsneedingsolution,butotherthanthat,itdoesn’ttendtoyieldthebestsolutionforthefuture.Partiesshouldkeepaclearfocusontheirinterests,butremainopentodifferentproposalsandpositions.
Successfulnegotiationsaretheresultofmutualgivingandtakingofinterestsratherthankeepingfirmonone’sownpositions.Themethodoffocusingonthecommoninterestsofnegotiatingpartiesworkswellbecausefirstly,thereisalwaysmoreonewayoffulfillingeachother’sinterests,andsecondly,bothsidescanalwaysfindoutcertaincommoninterests,otherwisetheywillnotsittogetherdiscussingandtalking.
Thefirsttwoprincipleslookattherelationbetweenpeopleandproblems,andinterestsandpositions,whichareconductivefornegotiatorstoestablishanobjectiveviewonthoseimportantfactorsinnegotiations.Thethirdprincipleofinventingoptionsformutualgainprovidesanapproachtofulfillmentofthetwoparties’demands.
Whyarenegotiatorseasilytrappedbytheirownpositions?
Theexplanationisthatmanynegotiationssimplyfocusonasingleeventandthesolutiontotheeventiseitherwinorlose,forexample,priceofacar,sizeofcommission,ortimelimitofaloan.Thedistributivenatureofinterestgaininglimitspeople’sscopeofthinkingandcausespeopletoinsistontheirownstance.Tothisend,negotiatorssh
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 丽哈