The Fallacy of Western Economics西方经济学谬论.docx
- 文档编号:25769156
- 上传时间:2023-06-13
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:6
- 大小:19.13KB
The Fallacy of Western Economics西方经济学谬论.docx
《The Fallacy of Western Economics西方经济学谬论.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《The Fallacy of Western Economics西方经济学谬论.docx(6页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
TheFallacyofWesternEconomics西方经济学谬论
TheFallacyofWesternEconomics;SlaveryinDisguise
byGhassanKadiforTheSakerBlog
Economicsisnotascience.Economicscannotbeexpressedinmerereproducibleandpredictablemathematicaltermsasinthecaseofphysics.
PhysicsandmathematicsaresubjectsandmanifestationsoftheUniversalLaw(LogosinGreek),whilsteconomicsisahuman-madesystemthatisbasedongreedandfear.ThefatherofeconomicsAdamSmithinhisfamousbook“TheWealthofNations”,triedtoestablisheconomic“laws”.These“laws”arestillacceptable250yearslater,butthose“laws”arenotmorethanindicationsthatpointtoprobabilitiesratherthantheaccuratepredictabilitythatphysicallawsprovide.
Economicsismadetolooklikeaverycomplexfieldofknowledgethatonlysavvyandseasonedeconomistscandaretrytounderstand.Whatmakesitlookdauntinglydifficult,especiallybythosewhoneverstudiedit,isthatnotonlyitsso-called“laws”areelasticandunpredictable,butalsobecauseofthevaguenessandmystiquethatsurroundit.Wherebothvaguenessandmoneyconverge,enterindividualsandnationsthataregreedyenoughandpowerfulenoughtocapitalizeontheshadesofgreyintheirfavour.Thusfar,theyhavebeenabletocommittheworstkindoftheftthatexceedsbyfaranycorporatethefteverexposed,letalonepossible.
Simplyput,theworldeconomyisbasedonkeepingrichnationsrichandpoornationspoor.Thisisafact,butthereisnolawofeconomicsthatexplainsthisand/oradmitit,becausetheso-called“laws”ofeconomicshavebeensetinstonebytherichnations.Andevenifeconomicsacknowledgessuchinequities,giventhatits“laws”haveatotallackofmorality,suchprofiteeringwouldberegardedassmartbusinessandsuccessfulmarketing.
Wearetoldthatthevalueofanycountry’scurrencyisareflectionofitswealth.Wealthis,oratleastusedtobe,describedintermsofthecountry’sresources,manufacturingbaseandexports.Whenhistoricallypowerfulnationshadlittleresourcestogeneratemorewealth,theydevelopedtheirmanufacturingindustriesandventuredoverseas,capturedcolonies,robbedtheirresourcesandturnedthemintorawmaterialthattheirindustriescouldusetogenerateexportandwealth.
Yetnow,manyofthosesameformercolonizershavelittleornoresourcesleft,littleornomanufacturingbaseleft,littleexports,buttheycontinuetobeconsideredwealthyandtheircurrenciesstillrankhigh.Theyhavehigh“GrossDomesticProducts”(GDP)andhigh“PerCapitaIncomes”.Thisisintotalcontradictiontothe“laws”ofeconomythatdefinewhatmakesrichnationsrich.
Ontheotherhand,therearemanynationsthatareresource-richandhaveveryastrongmanufacturingbaseandhighexports,butyettheyareconsideredtobepoor.Thisisalsointotalcontradictiontothe“laws”ofeconomicsthatdefinewhatmakespoornationspoor.
Itisnotasecretthatindustrialgiantslikesay,Nike,paysitsVietnamesemanufacturer$2-3forapairofshoesandthensellsitfor$100.Thevirtualslavelabourcontextiswellknown.Whatisrarelyeverspokenabouthowever,isthedecisionofWesternnationstokeepthecurrenciesofpoornationslowinadeliberateattempttokeepthempoorandtomakesurethattheycanbeusedascheapmanufacturersinordertofeedtheirowngreedandremainlookingwealthy.
Globalizationcomesintothescenetogivethisinequalitylongevityandsustainability,andofcoursefavouringthewealthynationsandmaintainingtheirstatusquo.OneUSDollarcouldbeworth20,000VietnameseDongsandwhatbuysastandardservice,sayahair-cut,inVietnamwouldnotbeenoughtobuyahair-cutintheUSAasthecurrencyvaluesaresodifferent,butglobalizationdoesnotallowpoorernationstobasetheireconomiesontheirownincomestandards.
AworkerinVietnamorIndonesiaispaidthehourlyratedictatedbytheeconomyofhiscountry,butthepurchasepowerofhisDongand/orRupiahisdictatedbythetokenvaluethatwealthynationsdecidetogivethosecurrencies.Thisis“justified”bygivingmanyguisesandnamesthatfraudulentlyreflecthonestyandtransparency;namesthatalsounderpinasystemofrewardingachievers.Theyusetermssuchas“freeeconomy”,“freetrade”“openmarket”,“competitiveness”and“laws”suchas“supplyanddemand”,allinamannertosugar-coatsuchinhumanediscrepancieswithaveiloflawfulnessandjustice.
Whilsttherelativelyneweconomicterm“PurchasingPowerParity”(PPP)accountsfordiscrepanciesinlocalcostandproductivitiesbasedonlocalanddomesticparametersratherthaninternationalones,inrealterms,itdoesnotputfoodonthetablesofpoornationsanddoesnotfeedemptybellies.Inrealterms,itisnothingshortofa“feel-good”potionanddoesnotgetreflectedonpoornations’standardoflivingandinternationaleconomicstatusandclout.
Butwhentheworkerofanationwithalowexchangerategoestobuybasiccommoditiesincludingfood,globalizationimpliesthathe/shewouldhavetopaytheinternationalpriceforrice,wheat,sugar,fuel,andmedications.Evenifsomeofthosecommoditiesareproducedlocally,internationalpricesapply,unlesstheyaresubsidizedbyone’sgovernment
Ononehandtheincomeceilingoftheworkerisloweredbytheperceivedinternationalvalueoftheirnationalcurrency,andthenontheotherhandthepurchasepowerofhis/herincomeisdictatedbyglobalterms.
ThesystemofworldeconomicspaysinDongsandRupiahandchargesinUSDollars.
GDP’sand“PerCapitaIncomes”ofnationsarenolongerbasedontherealwealthandproductivitiesofnations,butratheronarbitraryfiguresthatpowerfulnationsdeliberatelyimplementinwhichtheyovervaluetheirownproductivityandundervalueproductivitiesofpoorernations.
AndinanatmosphereofdiminishingWesternindustrialoutput,howdowealthynationsmanagetogeneratehighGDP’s,onemayask?
Well,theyresorttomanytricks,including“recycling”cheapimports.Forexample,aBelgianbusinessmancanimportT-shirtsfromChinaat$1each,andthenresellthemfor$20each.TheproceedsofhissalesturnoverareaccountedforinBelgium’sGDP,wheninfacttheactualproductivitywasimported.
Onceagain,wealthynationshidebehindthefaçadeofeconomicstojustifysuchdiscrepancies.Theyalsousetermssuchas“developedeconomy”tohidethecrimeofallowingthemselvestermsofreferencethathave“explanations”inthe“science”ofeconomy.Theythusgivethemselveshighereconomicstandardsovernationsthataredoomedtohave“developing”or“under-developed”tags.Ifthosetermsarestrippeddowntothecore,alltheyimplyisanewformofcolonialism,slaveryandinequitythatvaluesproductsandservicesnotontheirtruevalue,butonwhoprovidesthemtowhom.Suchterminologyfurthermoremakesitlooklikeitisduetotheirownfaultandpooreconomicmanagementthat“under-developed”and“developingcountries”areinthepredicamenttheyare,andthattheonusisonthemtodeveloptheireconomies.
Butthisisnotall.Internationalpricesofcommoditiessuchassugarandriceareindeedsubjecttointernationalcompetition,butthepriceoffuelisnot.
Fuelthatdrivesallenginesofproductivityhasapricethatisby-and-largefixedanddictatedbyoil-producingcountriesandgreedycartelslikeOPEC.Fordecades,OPEChadavirtualmonopolyandalicencetoprice-fixtheworld’smostvitalcommodity,untilnon-OPECproducerscameintothescene.Buttosaythatcurrentfuelpricesarejustandequitablewouldbeafarcry.
ThewealthynationsoftheWestrunontheprinciplesof“freeeconomy”,“openmarket”,“freetrade”and“competition”,butyettheverysameWestthatdoesnotallowmonopolyandprice-fixingisonethatendorsesandfeedsfromprice-fixingofpetroleumproducts.Domestically,highfuelpricesincurhightaxesandhighrevenuesforWesterngovernments,whichofcoursehurtthepoorsectoroftheWesterncommunitiesthemost.Andinternationally,highfuelpricesmeanthatpoornationsremainpoor.
Ifthewholeworldhadaunifiedandequitableeconomicsystemandtheterm“globaleconomy”wereapositiveandconstructivereality,avisittothedentistorbarbershouldcostthesameworldwide.Realitydictatesotherwise.Whatrealitydictatesisthatwhenabarberwhocharges50cforahaircutinMumbaigoestothepetrolstationorthepharmacyforexample,withoutgovernmentsubsidy,he’slikelytopaywhataNewYorkerpaysinUSDollars.
Andiftherewereafacefortheglobaleconomicthuggerythattheworldisreelingunder,ithastobetheUSDollar.Somemayarguethatitisthebanks,theRothschilds,andwhilstthisistrue,thevehicleofextortionandtheftistheUSDollar.WhenataxidriverinIndiagoestofillhistank,heisinadvertentlyhavingatransactioninUSDollars,andnotonedirectlywiththeRothschilds.
ItisquiteironicthattheUSDollarcontinuestohavecloutatatimewhenAmericahashugeeconomicproblems.Yet,withallthecripplingdebt,declaredandundeclared,adebtthatsomepunditsestimatetoexceed150trilliondollars,foraslongasthe“GreenBack”isthepreferredworldreservecurrency,Americawillcontinuetobeableto“weaponize”itscurrency.Indoingthishowever,andinimposingsanctionsonothernations,Americaisinadvertentlyspeedinguptheprocessofitsowneconomicdemise.WithtradeandotherorganizationssuchasBRICS,theSCO,the“RegionalComprehensiveEconomicPartnership”(RCEP),manynationsarelookingforwaystoliberatethemselvesfromdependencyontheUSDollar.EventheEUisfeelingthebruntoftheheatandsearchingforalternatives.
Intheabsenceofaglobally-ac
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- The Fallacy of Western Economics西方经济学谬论 Economics 西方经济学 谬论