Final Outline for Torts - NYU School of LawWord格式.docx
- 文档编号:13064442
- 上传时间:2022-10-04
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:34
- 大小:45.96KB
Final Outline for Torts - NYU School of LawWord格式.docx
《Final Outline for Torts - NYU School of LawWord格式.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Final Outline for Torts - NYU School of LawWord格式.docx(34页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
PLterms.Butherewedon’trequiresomeonetoact.
-Comesfromthedifferencebetweennonfeasanceandmisfeasance.Classically,nonfeasancewasnotrecognizedasaduty(protectiononphysicalautonomy).
-Don’twanttoputpeopleinasituationwheredoingnothingmadethemliable.
-Exceptionstothenodutytoactrule:
-Specialrelationships:
whendefendanthascustodyovertheplaintiffwhoisnotinapositiontoprotecthimself.
-NoargumentthatIammybrother’skeeper.
-Nodutyforneighbortoletyouusehispooltosaveyourburninghouse.
-Generallywhenthedefendantisinpositiontomakemoney.
-InFarwellv.Keaton,courtsaidtheywerecompanionsonasocialadventure,butthat’snotreallyaspecialrelationship.
-Commoncarriers,innkeepers,possessorsofpubliclandallhavespecialrelationshipswithpeopleintheircustody.
-SpecialknowledgeofdangerisNOTenoughifthereisnospecialrelationship(Harperv.Herman–boatdiver.Maybewouldhavebeenadutyifitwasakidwithnoparentorifhechargedfortheboattours–butindicatemoreofaspecialrelationship)
-Creatingrisk:
Onewhohasdoneanactandrealizesthatithascreatedanunreasonableriskofharmisunderadutytostopthatharmfromoccurring
-Courtsaidtherewasadutyforagascompanytowarnofdangersitknewaboutevenifitwasn’tbecauseofamistakebythecompany
-Nodutyforamanwhonoticedatreesrootswereloosetotelltheownersoftheproperty.(thesearebothnotecases)
-Onceyoustarttoact:
Afteryoustartacting,youwenolongerareworriedaboutyouautonomy.Restatementsaysyoucan’tdiscontinuecareforsomeoneinperil.
-Thisdoesn’tmeanifyoustopcare,thenyouareliable.Ifyoustopcarebecauseyouwerescaredforyourlife,thequestioniswhetherthatwasreasonableunderabreachstandard.
-Farwellv.Keaton–affirmativedutytoavoidactsthatmakethesituationworse(suchashere,drivingaroundforhoursandthenleavinghiminfrontofhisparents’place).Dutytocontinueacting
-34-
isanextensionofthis—ifyoustartedtoact,youprobablylefthiminaworsepositionbecausenooneelsecouldintervene.
-Ifthereisreallynoworseningofpositionaftertheintervention,thencourtsaresplitonhowtodecide.
-Incentives:
morelikelytostartquestionablerescuesifnodutylateron,butmorelikelytoquitearlytoo(butpeopledon’treallythinkaboutthis.
-ManystateshaveagoodSamaritanrulethatsaysadoctorwhotriestodelivercareingoodfaithwillnotbeliable.
-Promisethatleadstoharm:
Eventhoughtherewasnodutybeforethepromise,afterthepromise,thereisadutyiftheplaintiffcanshowreliance.
-Morganv.YubaCounty–Sheriffwhotoldwomanhewouldletherknowwhentheyreleasedamanshethoughtwouldkillherhadadutytoactuallydothat.
-Importantthatshereliedonthepromise.
-Nogeneraldutytowarn–seemslikeanobviousextensionofnoaffirmativedutytoact,exceptthatthecostofwarningissolow.
-Exceptions:
-Dutywhenthereisapromisemade,i.e.,ifthepromisewouldimplythatnothingwaswrongandsomethingwaswrong.(RandiW.)
-Notjustharmtothepersonpromised.InRandiW.v.MurocJointUnifiedSchoolDistrict.Fourschooldistrictsrecommendedteacherwhohadabusedstudents.
-Notecaselookedattherelationshipbetweentheparties,thenatureoftherisk,foreseeability,consequencesorimposingadutyandoverallpublicinterest
-Obviouslycasesthatdon’tinvolveabusedchildrenwouldhaveahigherstandardbecauseoflasttwofactors.
-Doctors:
Psychiatristshaveadutytowarnthepotentialvictimofharm.(Tarasoff)
-InTarasoff,theysaythereisaspecialrelationshipwiththepersoncreatingtheharm.
-Weighthepublicpolicyinterestofeffectivetherapy
againstthepublicinterestinsafety.
-Didnotextendtosuicidevictimbecausethepublicsafetyinterestisless.
-Doesnotextendtosomeonetellingthebartenderhewillkillsomeone.Lessofapublicpolicyinterestineffectivetherapy,butlessofaspecialrelationship
-CourtssplitonwhetherdoctorshavedutytotellfamilymembersifsomeonehasHIVorothercontagiousdisease.(considerthepublicpolicyinterestofprivacywithpublicsafetyinterest)
-Dutytoreportchildabuseifitisknown,andsomestatessayyouhaveadutytoreportacrime.
-Iftherewouldn’tbeadutywithoutastatute–thenyouhavetolookatthestatutetoseeifthereisaprivatecauseofacti
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Final Outline for Torts NYU School of Law
链接地址:https://www.bdocx.com/doc/13064442.html