Metonymy.docx
- 文档编号:4687292
- 上传时间:2022-12-07
- 格式:DOCX
- 页数:11
- 大小:22.64KB
Metonymy.docx
《Metonymy.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Metonymy.docx(11页珍藏版)》请在冰豆网上搜索。
Metonymy
Metonymy
FromWikipedia,thefreeencyclopedia
Inrhetoric,metonymy(IPA:
/mɨˈtɒnɨmi/)istheuseofawordforaconceptorobjectassociatedwiththeconcept/objectoriginallydenotedbytheword.
Metonymymaybeinstructivelycontrastedwithmetaphor.Bothfiguresinvolvethesubstitutionofonetermforanother.Inmetaphor,thissubstitutionisbasedonsimilarity,whileinmetonymy,thesubstitutionisbasedoncontiguity.
Metaphorexample:
Thatmanisapig(usingpiginsteadofunhygienicperson.Anunhygienicpersonislikeapig,butthereisnocontiguitybetweenthetwo).
Metonymyexample:
TheWhiteHousesupportsthebill(usingWhiteHouseinsteadofPresident.ThePresidentisnotliketheWhiteHouse,butthereiscontiguitybetweenthem).Itusescloselyrelatedsubjects
Incognitivelinguistics,metonymyreferstotheuseofasinglecharacteristictoidentifyamorecomplexentityandisoneofthebasiccharacteristicsofcognition.Itiscommonforpeopletotakeonewell-understoodoreasy-to-perceiveaspectofsomethingandusethataspecttostandeitherforthethingasawholeorforsomeotheraspectorpartofit.
Metonymyisattestedincognitiveprocessesunderlyinglanguage(e.g.theinfant'sassociationofthenipplewithmilk).Objectsthatappearstronglyinasinglecontextemergeascognitivelabelsforthewholeconcept,thusfuelinglinguisticlabelssuchas"sweat"torefertohardworkthatmightproduceit.
ThewordmetonymyisderivedfromtheGreekμετωνυμία(metōnymia)"achangeofname",fromμετά-(meta-)"beyond/changed"and-ωνυμία(-onymia),asuffixusedtonamefiguresofspeech,fromὄνομα(onoma),"name"(OED)).
Metonymycomparedtometaphorincognitivescienceandlinguistics
Metaphorandmetonymyarebothfiguresofspeechwhereonewordmaybeusedinplaceofanother.However,especiallyincognitivescienceandlinguistics,thetwofiguresofspeechworkverydifferently.RomanJakobsonarguedthattheyrepresenttwofundamentallydifferentwaysofprocessinglanguage;henotedthatdifferentformsofaphasiaaffectedtheabilitytointerpretthetwofiguresdifferently(Jakobson,Roman(2002),"TwoAspectsofLanguageandTwoTypesofDisturbances",writtenatCambridge,MA,inLindaWaughandMoniqueMonville-Burston,OnLanguage,HarvardUniversityPress, //www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/JAKONL.html? show=catalogcopy>). Metonymyworksbythecontiguity(association)betweentwoconcepts,whereasmetaphorworksbythesimilaritybetweenthem.Whenpeopleusemetonymy,theydonottypicallywishtotransferqualitiesfromonereferenttoanotherastheydowithmetaphor: thereisnothingpress-likeaboutreportersorcrown-likeaboutamonarch,but"thepress"and"thecrown"arebothcommonmetonyms. Twoexamplesusingtheterm"fishing"helpmakethedistinctionbetter(exampledrawnfromDirven,1996).Thephrase"tofishpearls"usesmetonymy,drawingfrom"fishing"theideaoftakingthingsfromtheocean.Whatiscarriedacrossfrom"fishingfish"to"fishingpearls"isthedomainofusageandtheassociationswiththeoceanandboats,butweunderstandthephraseinspiteofratherthanbecauseoftheliteralmeaningoffishing: weknowyoudonotuseafishingrodornettogetpearlsandweknowthatpearlsarenot,anddonotoriginatefrom,fish. Incontrast,themetaphoricalphrase"fishingforinformation",transferstheconceptoffishingintoanewdomain.Ifsomeoneis"fishing"forinformation,wedonotimaginethatheorsheisanywhereneartheocean,ratherwetransferelementsoftheactionoffishing(waiting,hopingtocatchsomethingthatcannotbeseen)intoanewdomain(aconversation).Thus,metonymyworksbycallingupadomainofusageandanarrayofassociations(intheexampleabove,boats,theocean,gatheringlifefromthesea)whereasmetaphorpicksatargetsetofmeaningsandtransfersthemtoanewdomainofusage. Example: "Lendmeyourear" Sometimes,metaphorandmetonymycanbothbeatworkinthesamefigureofspeech,oronecouldinterpretaphrasemetaphoricallyormetonymically.Forexample,thephrase"lendmeyourear"couldbeanalyzedinanumberofways.Wecouldimaginethefollowinginterpretations: 1.Metonymyonly: Analyze"ear"metonymicallyfirst—"ear"means"attention"(becauseweuseearstopayattentiontosomeone'sspeech).Nowwhenwehearthephrase"lendingear(attention)",westretchthebasemeaningof"lend"(toletsomeoneborrowanobject)toincludethe"lending"ofnon-materialthings(attention),butbeyondthisslightextensionoftheverb,nometaphorisatwork. 2.Metaphoronly: Imaginethewholephraseliterally—imaginethatthespeakerliterallyborrowsthelistener'searasaphysicalobject(andpresumablytheperson'sheadwithit).Thenthespeakerhastemporarypossessionofthelistener'sear,sothelistenerhasgrantedthespeakertemporarycontroloverwhatthelistenerhears.Wetheninterpretthephrase"lendmeyourear"metaphoricallytomeanthatthespeakerwantsthelistenertograntthespeakertemporarycontroloverwhatthelistenerhears. 3.Metaphorandmetonymy: First,analyzetheverbphrase"lendmeyourear"metaphoricallytomean"turnyourearinmydirection,"sinceweknowthatliterallylendingabodyisnonsensical.Then,analyzethemotionofearsmetonymically—weassociate"turningears"with"payingattention",whichiswhatthespeakerwantsthelistenerstodo. Itisdifficulttosaywhichoftheaboveanalysesmostcloselyrepresentsthewayalistenerinterpretstheexpression,anditispossiblethatthephraseisanalysedindifferentwaysbydifferentlisteners,orevenbyoneandthesamelisteneratdifferenttimes.Regardless,allthreeanalysesyieldthesameinterpretation;thus,metaphorandmetonymy,thoughquitedifferentintheirmechanism,canworktogetherseamlessly.Forfurtheranalysisofidiomsinwhichmetaphorandmetonymyworktogether,includinganexampleverysimilartotheonegivenhere,seeGeeraerts,Dirk(2002),"Theinteractionofmetaphorandmetonymyincompositeexpressions",writtenatBerlin,inRenéDirven&RalfPörings,MetaphorandMetonymyinContrast,MoutondeGruyter, Metonymyinpolysemy Theconceptofmetonymyalsoinformsthenatureofpolysemy—i.e.howthesamephonologicalform(word)hasdifferentsemanticmappings(meanings).Ifthetwomeaningsareunrelated,asinthewordpenmeaningwritinginstrumentversusenclosure,theyareconsideredhomonyms. Withinlogicalpolysemies,alargeclassofmappingscanbeconsideredtobeacaseofmetonymictransfer(e.g.chickenfortheanimal,aswellasitsmeat;crownfortheobject,aswellastheinstitution).Othercaseswherethemeaningispolysemoushowever,mayturnouttobemoremetaphorical,e.g.eyeasintheeyeoftheneedle. Metonymyasarhetoricalstrategy Metonymycanalsorefertotherhetoricalstrategyofdescribingsomethingindirectlybyreferringtothingsaroundit.Forexample,inJaneAusten'snovelPrideandPrejudice,themaincharacterElizabeth'schangeofheartandloveforhersuitor,Mr.Darcy,isfirstrevealedwhensheseeshishouse: Theygraduallyascendedforhalf-a-mile,andthenfoundthemselvesatthetopofaconsiderableeminence,wherethewoodceased,andtheeyewasinstantlycaughtbyPemberleyHouse,situatedontheoppositesideofavalley,intowhichtheroadwithsomeabruptnesswound.Itwasalarge,handsomestonebuilding,standingwellonrisingground,andbackedbyaridgeofhighwoodyhills;andinfront,astreamofsomenaturalimportancewasswelledintogreater,butwithoutanyartificialappearance.Itsbankswereneitherformalnorfalselyadorned.Elizabethwasdelighted.Shehadneverseenaplaceforwhichnaturehaddonemore,orwherenaturalbeautyhadbeensolittlecounteractedbyanawkwardtaste.JaneAusten,PrideandPrejudice,Chapter43. AustendescribesthehouseandElizabeth'sadmirationfortheestateatlengthasanindirectwayofdescribingherfeelingsforMr.Darcyhimself.Onecouldattempttoreadthisasanextendedmetaphor,butsuchareadingwouldbreakdownasonetriedtofindawaytomaptheelementsofherdescription(risingground,swollenriver)directlytoattributesofhersuitor.Furthermore,anextendedmetaphortypicallyhighlightstheauthor'singenuitybymaintaininganunlikelysimilaritytoanunusualdegreeofdetail. Inthisdescription,ontheotherhand,althoughtherearemanyelementsofthedescriptionthatwecouldtransferdirectlyfromthegroundstothesuitor(naturalbeauty,lackofartifice),Austenisemphasizingtheconsistencyofthedomainofusageratherthanstretchingtomakeafreshcomparison: eachofthethingsshedescribessheassociateswithDarcy,andintheendwefeelthatDarcyisasbeautifulastheplacetowhichheiscomparedandthathebelongswithinit.Metonymyofthiskindthushelpsdefineapersonorthingthroughasetofmutuallyreinforcingassociationsratherthanthroughacomparison.Advertisingfrequentlyusesthiskindofmetonymy,puttingaproductincloseproximitytosomethingdesirableinordertomakeanindirectassociationthatwouldseemcrassifmadewithadirectcomparison. Metonymyandsynecdoche Synecdoche,whereaspecificpartofsomethingisusedtorefertothewhole,isusuallyunderstoodasaspecifickindofmetonymy.Sometimes,however,peoplemakeanabsolutedistinctionbetweenametonymyandasynecdoche,treatingmetonymyasdifferentfromratherthaninclusiveofsynecdoche.Thereisasimilarproblemwiththeusageofsimileandmetaphor. Whenthedistinct
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- Metonymy